|
|
Obviously, I prefer first one, it's the one that could be considered
nice as a normal scene.
It's a pattern crackle height field, is it not ?
I think we can see hf artefacts on some edges. Maybe increase resolution.
JC
Tek wrote:
> I've been messing around with a few ideas for the short code contest.
> Unfortunately I've got several scenes that I'm quite pleased with (though I
> admit I'm no expert in short code), and I'm not sure which one(s) to enter. Plus
> I've kind of got stuck because I can't find any ways to improve them without
> needing more code!
>
> Each of these images was done with just 256 bytes of pov code, in fact one is
> done in a lot less!
>
> So... which one do you like best? how can I improve the pictures?
>
> As usual, your comments and criticism would help me greatly :)
>
> BTW, for anyone who's wondering what the short code competition is, here's the
> page about it:
> http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/~pbourke/povray/scc3/
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|